Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224861›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biophilic interventions in real and virtual environments reduce stress during cognitively demanding tasks.

Hilary Serra, Claudio Zavattaro, Marco Eid, Pierangelo Farina, Debora Abbatescianna, Emanuele Cirillo, Roberto Gammeri, Luisella Celi, Valentina Scariot, Raffaella Ricci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hilary SerraSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy. hilary.serra@unito.it.
Claudio ZavattaroSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Marco EidBLUE Engineering, 10098, Rivoli, Italy.
Pierangelo FarinaBLUE Engineering, 10098, Rivoli, Italy.
Debora AbbatesciannaSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Emanuele CirilloSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Roberto GammeriSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Luisella CeliDepartment of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Valentina ScariotDepartment of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Raffaella RicciSpace, Attention and Action Laboratory (SAN Lab), Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy. raffaella.ricci@unito.it.

Funding

Blue Engineering CELL_CT_RIC_22_01Blue Engineering RICR_CT_CONSUL_21_01MUR PNRR 38-411-31-DOT13BN7S7-1302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophilic design integrates natural elements into indoor environments to mitigate the negative effects of urbanization on human well-being. However, its efficacy in reducing stress during demanding tasks and the extent to which virtual biophilic interventions replicate real-world benefits remain unclear. We investigated whether a small-scale biophilic intervention-a removable, medium-sized living wall (LW) containing plants-reduces stress during performance of a cognitively demanding working memory task and positively influences emotions and environmental judgment. Its effects were compared to those of a virtual simulation. Forty-one participants, assigned to either a real (N = 21) or virtual (N = 20) environment, completed two sessions: one with the LW, one with an object-filled shelf. Heart rate variability, self-reported emotions, and environmental evaluations were collected. The results show higher physiological relaxation during the task and more favorable environmental ratings when exposed to the LW, regardless of the type of environment. Positive emotions were higher only in the real environment, suggesting a stronger emotional impact of real biophilic elements. These findings are of practical relevance for places where managing stress during demanding activities is crucial (offices, schools) or where access to nature is limited (hospitals, confined spaces).

Indexed as

CognitionStress, PsychologicalVirtual RealityAdultEmotionsEnvironmentFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermYoung AdultBiophilic designCognitive performanceHeart rate variabilityPhysiological arousalStress reductionVirtual reality (VR)

Identifiers

PMID41224861
PMCPMC12612148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.