ArticleScientific data2025
Global Bias-Corrected CORDEX Datasets at Half Degree Resolution.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Bias-Corrected CORDEX Dataset at Quarter Degree Resolution.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A Bias-Corrected HighResMIP Dataset for Impact Assessment Studies.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Global Bias-Corrected CORDEX Datasets at Half Degree Resolution.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiments (CORDEX) consistently provide dynamically downscaled high-resolution climate data, their biases are nonetheless corrected against subjectively selected observational datasets and varying bias-correction methods, making impact assessments inconsistent. Impact assessment communities, such as the Intersectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), prefer consistent climate simulations that are corrected for biases using the same method against a common set of observational datasets. We present the quasi-global datasets of GloBCORD-HD, prepared at a daily temporal and 0.5° spatial resolution for the historical period (1950-2019) and the future period (2020-2099) for three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5. Three datasets were developed by bias-correcting CORDEX experiments, which dynamically downscaled the Earth System Models of MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR, ICHEC-EC-EARTH, and NOAA-GFDL-GFDL-ESM2M over the maximum number of regional domains, against the single observational dataset GSWP3-W5E5 v2.0, using the same ISIMIP3BASD v2.5 bias correction algorithm. Comprehensive validation demonstrates that GloBCORD-HD reduces biases, improves regional extremes representation, enhances climate signals consistency, with seamless boundary transitions, and enables robust global impact assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.