ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of particle size distribution on screening efficiency of vibrating screen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on the optimization efficiency of secondary vibrating screening based on EDEM simulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrating screen screening efficiency is affected by a variety of factors, among which particle size distribution (PSD) has long been neglected by researchers. In order to reveal the actual influence of PSD on screening efficiency, this paper systematically explores the mechanism of PSD on the screening efficiency of vibrating screen based on discrete element method simulation. Based on the relative sieve hole size of the particles, the feed particles are classified into three categories: permeable sieve particles, refractory sieve particles and obstructive particles. The simulation results show that obstructive particles significantly enhance the screening efficiency, while refractory sieve particles have an inhibitory effect and permeable sieve particles have a small effect. It was found that the probability of various types of particles passing through the sieve is basically stable under different PSD conditions, and then constructed a sieve efficiency prediction model based on the content of particles and the probability of passing through the sieve, and the prediction results are highly consistent with the simulation data, and the prediction error is controlled within ± 5%. In addition, the double-deck vibrating screen exhibited higher screening efficiency and stability under complex PSD conditions, outperforming the single-deck structure in 96.6% of the experimental groups. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the optimization of vibrating screen process parameters and structural design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.