Trial reportScientific reports2025
Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS), for elderly patients (aged 75 years and older) with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R/BR-PDAC). A post hoc analysis was conducted using data from a randomized controlled trial on NAC for R/BR-PDAC (CSGO-HBP-015). Patients were divided into two groups: those aged 75 years and older (7/46 in GS and 16/48 in GA) and those under 75 years. Short-term outcomes, including resection rates, adverse events (AEs), postoperative complications, and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, were compared between age groups for both regimens. The incidence of AEs in patients aged 75 years and older tended to be higher than those of younger patients in both chemotherapy arms, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, the resection rates, postoperative complication rates, and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were not affected by age. Both regimens showed comparable safety profiles in elderly and younger cohorts. The GA and GS regimens can be safely administered as NAC for R/BR-PDAC in elderly patients without adversely affecting postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that both regimens are feasible NAC options even for patients 75 years and older, supporting the need for further randomized controlled trials to validate these outcomes in the elderly population.Trial registration. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000021484. This trial began in April 2016, and first registration (First Posted date) is 01/04/2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.