ArticleScientific reports2025
D-TNet: a hybrid Dense Net-transformer model for robust diabetic retinopathy detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of CNN and Transformer Models for Multi-Class Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Using Fundus Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI driven Hybrid CNN transformer model for early detection and severity assessment of diabetic retinopathy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Framework with Explainability for Dental Caries Classification Using Intra-Oral Photographs and Radiographs.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- High-precision non-destructive blade surface inspection via self learning transformer networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the main causes of blindness in the globe and a dangerous side effect of diabetes is Diabetic Retinopathy (DR). Preventing permanent vision loss and guaranteeing prompt medical intervention depend on early identification and precise DR severity assessment. Conventional techniques for diagnosing DR depend on experts manually examining retinal pictures, which takes time and is vulnerable to subjectivity. Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have become attractive substitutes, current approaches frequently suffer from unbalanced classification performance, poor generalisability, and trouble differentiating various DR severity levels. This work offers a Hybrid Deep Learning (DL) strategy D-TNet, which combines DenseNet121 for spatial feature extraction with a Transformer architecture for modeling long-range contextual dependencies to overcome these issues. The model detects key DR indicators like microaneurysms, hemorrhages, and neovascularization. A collection of retinal images from APTOS2019 and Messidor-2 datasets was used to train and test this hybrid model for DR severity grading in five different categories namely healthy retina, Mild, Moderate, Proliferative, and Severe. The model detects key DR indicators like microaneurysms, hemorrhages, and neovascularization. Evaluated on two benchmark datasets, the model achieved 97% accuracy, 0.94 F1-score, and 0.93 kappa score on APTOS2019, and 86% accuracy, 0.79 F1-score, and 0.80 kappa score on Messidor-2. These results demonstrate robust and balanced classification across all five DR severity stages. The model overcame the sensitivity and specificity issues frequently seen in traditional AI-based techniques by exhibiting stable and balanced classification throughout all DR phases. This method has the potential to greatly improve diabetic eye care by offering dependable and scalable DR detection, especially in environments with limited resources. Future work includes domain adaptation for cross-dataset validation and real-world deployment, along with the integration of multimodal data such as blood sugar level, fasting glucose, and HbA1c to enhance diagnostic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.