Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224768›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Mechanistic prediction of community composition across resource conditions and species richness.

Zhijie Zhang, Lutz Becks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhijie ZhangState Key Laboratory for Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing, China. zhijie.zhang@pku.edu.cn.
Lutz BecksAquatic Ecology and Evolution, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-5253

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) ZH 113/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting species coexistence and community assembly is a central goal in ecology. Traditional methods, based on the effect of one species on another (e.g., Lotka-Volterra competition model), are sensitive to environmental context. This is because they ignore the fundamental processes that can be applied across environments. While mechanistic approaches offer promise, empirical tests remain rare. Here, we integrate a mechanistic consumer-resource model with the growth of 12 phytoplankton species in monoculture over a range of nitrate, ammonium or phosphorous concentrations. We find that the mechanistic approach accurately predicts the composition of 960 communities across species richness and resource conditions. We confirm by simulations, species competing for substitutable resources (nitrate vs. ammonium) exhibit greater diversity than those competing for essential resources (nitrate vs. phosphorus), especially when initial species richness is high. This is because, in competition for essential resources, each species is likely to consume less of the resource that is more limiting to its growth, which violates the mechanistic rule of coexistence that states that each species must consume more of the resource that more limit it. Our study highlights the power of the mechanistic approach in understanding and predicting species loss across environments and, ultimately, mitigating its pace.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemPhytoplanktonAmmonium CompoundsModels, BiologicalNitratesPhosphorusAmmonium CompoundsNitratesPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID41224768
PMCPMC12612213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.