Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224755›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Integration of metagenome-assembled genomes with clinical isolates expands the genomic landscape of gut-associated Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Samriddhi Gupta, Alexandre Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samriddhi GuptaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alexandre AlmeidaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. aa2369@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8803-0893

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/W016184/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen causing diseases ranging from gastrointestinal disorders to severe liver abscesses. While clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae have been extensively studied, less is known about asymptomatic variants colonizing the human gut across diverse populations. Developments in genome-resolved metagenomics have offered unprecedented access to metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), expanding the known bacterial diversity within the gut microbiome. Here we analysed 656 human gut-derived K. pneumoniae genomes (317 MAGs, 339 isolates) from 29 countries to investigate the population structure and genomic landscape of gut-associated lineages. Over 60% of MAGs were found to belong to new sequence types, highlighting a large uncharacterized diversity of K. pneumoniae missing among sequenced clinical isolates. In particular, integrating MAGs nearly doubled gut-associated K. pneumoniae phylogenetic diversity, and uncovered 86 MAGs with >0.5% genomic distance compared to 20,792 Klebsiella isolate genomes from various sources. Pan-genome analyses identified 214 genes exclusively detected among MAGs, with 107 predicted to encode putative virulence factors. Notably, combining MAGs and isolates revealed genomic signatures linked to health and disease and more accurately classified disease and carriage states compared to isolates alone. These findings showcase the value of metagenomics to understand pathogen evolution and diversity with implications for public health surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, BacterialKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMetagenomeGenetic VariationHumansMetagenomicsPhylogenyVirulence FactorsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID41224755
PMCPMC12612154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.