ArticleZoological research2025
Imperfect detection biases β diversity estimates based on whether species are shared between sites.
Article in Zoological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imperfect detection is a form of sampling error that can bias measurements of species occurrence and is widely known to bias measures of local (α) and regional (γ) diversity. However, it is less well known how imperfect detection affects estimates of β diversity, the variation in species composition among sites, especially when incorporating species traits and evolutionary histories. Using a decade of avian monitoring data collected across 36 subtropical islands, occupancy model was applied to correct imperfect detection and to quantify its impact on taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic β diversity in relation to island area and isolation. To assess the broader generality of these patterns, simulations were conducted incorporating multiple ecological and sampling drivers, including survey design and community structure. Both empirical and simulated analyses revealed that imperfect detection consistently led to overestimates of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic β diversity, primarily due to the under-detection of shared species, which, in turn, obscured diversity relationships with island attributes. In the empirical dataset, the extent of overestimation increased with greater differences in island area, whereas simulations demonstrated that repeated surveys per site effectively reduced this bias. Collectively, these findings establish a general framework explaining how imperfect detection systematically biases all facets of β diversity by altering observed species composition. This mechanism offers broad applicability across various biological taxa and ecological systems, enhancing the accuracy of biodiversity measurements, particularly functional and phylogenetic diversity. Given the importance of β diversity in understanding spatial and temporal community turnover, it is imperative to prioritize its accurate quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.