Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224667›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex.

Sebastijan Veselic, Elena Gutierrez, Mohamady El-Gaby, Sandra Reinert, Mathias Sablé-Meyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastijan VeselicDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom sebastijan.veselic@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Elena GutierrezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Mohamady El-GabyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Sandra ReinertSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour College, University College London, London W1T 4JG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-7433
Mathias Sablé-MeyerSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour College, University College London, London W1T 4JG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0844-0775

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is critical for our ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt our behavior in new environments based on our previous experience. Despite its importance, the neural substrates and mechanisms by which the PFC supports this function have long remained enigmatic. Recent advances, however, have begun to change this. An increasingly large body of work suggests the PFC represents structured relationships-both among states of the outside world and between internally generated actions. In this review, we describe work from rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans to draw attention to the breadth of such representations and how they support flexible behavior. Across species, the PFC appears to represent the relational structure of problems: how stimuli relate to one another in cognitive maps or how different behaviors relate to one another when pursuing a goal. These results have started to reveal shared computational principles for PFC that generalize from rodents to humans and have inspired formal computational models and simulations. By reviewing experimental work showing both correlation and causation through invasive and noninvasive methods, along with theoretical work using artificial neural networks, we aim to highlight similarities and differences between species and models to provide a common language for interpreting findings in PFC. This will move us closer to a mechanistic understanding of the PFC that scales across tasks and species.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCognitionPrefrontal CortexAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41224667
PMCPMC12614045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.