ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Planning-related hubs and brain network organization during motor decision-making.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Dynamic geometry remapping of neural activity within frontal and subcortical areas during decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A brain-wide, trial- and time-dependent deterministic drive synergizes with within-trial noise to time self-initiated actions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual decision-making is the process by which sensory evidence is combined with prior knowledge and transformed into possible movement plans according to a rule or policy. Classic studies suggested that perceptual decisions emerge from a feedforward hierarchy of brain areas with distinct functions and fairly homogeneous neural representations. However, more recent findings argue that decisions emerge from distributed, recurrent computations across many brain areas (a "heterarchy") with complex, heterogeneous representations. How can we make sense of these findings in a way that preserves the computational elegance of the conventional view? In this review, we describe how a new generation of studies is leveraging high-density electrophysiology, incisive task designs, causal manipulations (e.g., optogenetics) and statistical approaches for probing inter-area communication, and theoretical methods that connect population dynamics with representational geometry to build a modern framework for understanding perceptual decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.