ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2026
SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diagnosis and Management of High-Grade B-Cell Lymphomas.
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study comparing the efficacy of R-CHOP and R-DA-EPOCH regimens in young, high-risk treatment-naïve diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) represent a heterogeneous group of aggressive mature B-cell malignancies characterized by clinical, morphologic, and cytogenetic features that bridge diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma. Current classification frameworks define HGBL largely by morphology and MYC-based cytogenetics, yielding categories that are inconsistently applied and biologically incomplete. Recent gene expression profiling studies have identified a reproducible "dark-zone signature" (DZsig), present in most double-hit lymphomas and a subset of DLBCL, which portends poor outcomes and provides a more objective biological definition of HGBL. Genomic studies further demonstrate that HGBL can arise from diverse DLBCL subtypes, converging on MYC deregulation, genomic instability, and T-cell depleted immune microenvironment. Therapeutically, retrospective and phase 2 studies suggest improved outcomes with intensified regimens such as dose-adjusted EPOCH-R compared with R-CHOP, though randomized data remain limited. This review focuses on the application of DZsig and molecular classifications, applicability of the POLARIX trial data to HGBL of germinal center B cell and activated B cell subtypes, and the use of novel T-cell engaging therapies in HGBL. CAR T-cell therapy has transformed the relapsed/refractory setting, with comparable efficacy in HGBL and DLBCL. In contrast, responses to CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies appear attenuated in HGBL-DH, though combination regimens with antibody-drug conjugates or chemotherapy show promise. Other options, including CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugates, offer some activity. Future progress will depend on replacing morphology-based criteria with biology-driven classification that incorporates DZsig and genomic subtyping, and on developing rational, mechanism-based therapies that address both tumor-intrinsic drivers and the hostile microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.