ArticleBMJ open2025
Exploring awareness, attitudes and clinical practices of Ukrainian health professionals regarding human papillomavirus and vaccination: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer, a preventable disease, remains a significant public health issue in Ukraine, characterised by low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates and systemic healthcare challenges exacerbated by the ongoing war. To improve the situation with HPV vaccination, understanding the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial.
aimThis study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness and clinical practices of Ukrainian HCPs regarding HPV, HPV-related diseases and vaccination. It sought to identify their readiness to recommend vaccination, the barriers they face and the impact of the full-scale Russia-Ukrainian war on these aspects.
methodsA qualitative exploratory study was conducted using the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) framework. Data were collected through 12 focus group discussions, 10 in-depth semistructured interviews and short questionnaires with 60 HCPs (gynaecologists, paediatricians, general practitioners, nurses and key decision-makers) across four macroregions of Ukraine in July 2023. A descriptive thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data.
resultsThe study found support for HPV vaccination among HCPs, who recognise it as a critical cancer prevention tool. However, significant barriers impede its implementation. These include organisational challenges like the vaccine's high cost and non-mandatory status, professional issues such as knowledge gaps and prevalent misconceptions (eg, belief in natural immunity, doubts about vaccine safety), particularly among non-gynaecological specialists, and low public awareness of the HPV-cancer link. The war has intensified these barriers by shifting priorities and disrupting services, yet it has also paradoxically increased vaccine awareness among Ukrainians who have been abroad.
conclusionThe successful rollout of Ukraine's national HPV vaccination programme requires a comprehensive strategy. Merely adding the vaccine to the schedule is insufficient. It must be accompanied by robust state funding to ensure it is free, a large-scale public information campaign to combat misinformation and raise awareness and targeted continuing medical education to close knowledge gaps and empower HCPs to recommend the vaccine confidently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.