ArticleBMJ open2025
Improved quality of recommendations after sentinel event analysis with recommendation improvement matrix training: a before-and-after study at an international patient safety conference.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the recommendation improvement matrix (RIM) methodology for improving the quality of recommendations resulting from sentinel event analysis, where we hypothesise that the use of the RIM methodology leads to better quality recommendations.
designA before-and-after analysis of the quality of the formulated recommendations after sentinel event analysis.
settingThe study was carried out during the 2023 Saudi Patient Safety Centre International Patient Safety Conference.
participants36 conference participants, including nurses, medical doctors, pharmacists, dentists, general practitioners and quality officers.
interventionsRIM methodology training during a structured 3-hour workshop.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of recommendations that using the χ
resultsPrior to training, 49 recommendations were generated, of which 63.3% met the filter criteria. Post-training, the proportion of recommendations passing the filter increased significantly to 83% (p=0.00543). Adjustments to recommendations primarily improved alignment with the filter criteria, though limited improvements were observed in matrix categorisation. Participants rated the methodology's feasibility and usability highly, with average scores of 4.39/5 and 4.43/5, respectively. However, 46% expressed a need for additional training, particularly on the matrix application.
conclusionsThe RIM methodology significantly improves the quality of recommendations following sentinel event analyses. To enhance its impact, further training focusing on matrix application is necessary. Incorporating the methodology into healthcare education and professional development could strengthen patient safety practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.