ArticleBMJ open2025
Introducing an on-site Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physician in a Norwegian Emergency Medical Communication Centre: a focus group study on the experiences of operators and physicians.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore the experiences of emergency medical communication centre (EMCC) operators and helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) physicians following the introduction of an on-site HEMS physician in a Norwegian EMCC.
designThe study was designed as a qualitative focus group study. Data from the focus groups were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.
settingThe intervention was implemented at the regional EMCC and one HEMS base in mid-Norway.
participantsSeven HEMS physicians and 22 EMCC operators from the EMCC and HEMS base in Trondheim, Norway, participated in the focus groups.
interventionFrom 1 February to 5 July 2024, an on-site EMCC physician was introduced in Trondheim EMCC, being responsible for medical decision-making in HEMS dispatches during working hours in the intervention period.
resultsThe analysis revealed two overarching themes: (1) perceived impact on the decision-making process in HEMS dispatch and (2) increased trust through mutual learning and closer relationships. Overall, the study participants reported positive experiences with the intervention. They experienced that an on-site physician improved the basis for decision-making in HEMS dispatch, allowing for quicker decisions. The participants were uncertain regarding whether this led to more accurate HEMS dispatch decisions. They valued the opportunity to better understand each other's skills and build stronger professional relationships.
conclusionsBoth EMCC operators and HEMS physicians experienced improved decision-making and faster dispatch conclusions in HEMS dispatch following the intervention. The high level of medical education and guideline adherence among EMCC operators questions the impact on HEMS dispatch accuracy following the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.