ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026
Disparities in cancer survival by socioeconomic status: findings from a population-based study of 942 241 Australians from 1980 to 2019.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic disparities in sarcoma diagnosis, expert center access, and advocacy group awareness: a multicenter study in Southern Europe.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Survival improvement and widening social disadvantage-related disparities in osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion as scientific rigor: progress during challenging times.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Perioperative cognitive dysfunction in bladder cancer patients, causal factors, and possible interventions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer survival in Australia has improved over time, but disparities by socioeconomic status persist. We analyzed data from the population-wide New South Wales Cancer Registry, including 942 241 individuals with invasive solid cancers diagnosed between 1980 and 2019. We examined cancer-specific and all-cause deaths by area-based socioeconomic status for all solid cancers and 12 common cancers using competing risks regression alongside crude survival. Five-year cancer-specific survival for all cancers improved from 50.3% in 1980-1989 to 73.3% in 2010-2019. Risk of cancer death was higher for individuals living in most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas (vs least disadvantaged areas), and differences increased over time: from a sub-hazard ratio of 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.07) in 1980-1989 to 1.35 (95% CI = 1.32 to 1.38) in 2010-2019 (adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, cancer spread). Statistically significant and increasing differences were observed for prostate, breast, melanoma, colorectal, lung, bladder, and stomach cancers. Disparities in cancer survival have continued to widen, requiring improved understanding and targeted interventions to address inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.