Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41223888›Full record

ArticleEwha medical journal2025

Hip fracture and cognitive impairment in older adults-integrated approaches to rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Seung-Kyu Lim, Jae-Young Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seung-Kyu LimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
Jae-Young LimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare RS-2025-02217163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragility fractures, particularly hip fractures, represent a major public health concern among older adults and are associated with high morbidity, mortality, functional decline, and socioeconomic burden. Cognitive impairment is common in older adults with hip fractures and contributes to increased fracture risk, poor postoperative outcomes, delayed recovery, and higher rates of institutionalization. This review aimed to examine rehabilitation strategies for older adults with hip fractures, with a specific focus on considerations for those with cognitive impairment. Evidence suggests that individuals with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment can achieve meaningful functional gains through structured, intensive, multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs incorporating progressive resistance training, balance and mobility exercises, and individualized approaches tailored to cognitive and physical abilities. However, the implementation of such programs is often hindered by insufficient staff training and awareness in dementia-specific rehabilitation, limited resources, and the lack of standardized protocols defining eligibility, intensity, and adaptation. Optimizing outcomes requires structured, tailored rehabilitation protocols, enhanced staff education, interprofessional collaboration, and proactive management of delirium and secondary fracture prevention through fracture liaison services, while concurrently addressing systemic barriers such as resource constraints. Integrated, coordinated care across the continuum is essential to maximize recovery, independence, and quality of life in older adults with hip fractures and cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

AgedCognition disordersDementiaHip fracturesRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41223888
PMCPMC12611440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.