ArticleHealth & place2025
Uneven access to essential services and amenities: Geographic disparities in 'third place' availability across the United States from 2010 to 2021.
Article in Health & place, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring "third places": Comparing neighborhood data for cognitive health research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Comparative dynamics of coffee-tea cultural spaces in two Chinese cities: Evidence from Qingdao and Jinan, 2018-2024.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
'Third places' are pivotal to daily life as community sites outside of home (first place) and work (second place) that foster civic engagement, social cohesion, upward mobility, and population health. However, their distribution is uneven, and accelerated closures since the Great Recession may deepen socio-geographic disparities across the United States. Using Census tract-level data from the National Establishment Time-Series Database, we investigated changes in third place availability from 2010 to 2021 across 12 categories: art galleries, beauty and barber shops, civic and social organizations, coffee shops, fast-food outlets, grocery stores, libraries, movie theaters, museums, recreation centers, restaurants, and senior centers. Generalized additive mixed models assessed variations by racial/ethnic composition, educational attainment, and rural-urban status. Despite their importance to individual and collective health, all categories experienced widespread closures from 2019 to 2021. While disparities in reduced availability varied by third place categories, declines were particularly acute in Census tracts with higher concentrations of socially vulnerable populations and in rural areas. Our findings demonstrate substantial geographic variation and ongoing change in third place availability. Identifying these disparities is essential to address widening gaps in socioeconomic opportunity and health equity. Targeted interventions and policies that promote more equitable access to third places are essential to support communities 'left behind' and advance both individual and collective health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.