Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41223381›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Psychological Factors Influencing Pain Perception and Experience in Women Undergoing Mammography: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Irene Neophytou, George Charalambous, Eleni Jelastopulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene Neophytou *Department of Health Sciences, Frederick University, Gianni Freiderikou 7, Nicosia, 1036, Cyprus, 357 97442553.ORCID 0009-0000-5925-0571
George CharalambousDepartment of Health Sciences, Frederick University, Gianni Freiderikou 7, Nicosia, 1036, Cyprus, 357 97442553.ORCID 0000-0001-6384-732X
Eleni Jelastopulu *University of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7499-4034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Mammographic screening significantly improves the early detection and survival rates. However, the pain and discomfort experienced during mammography, primarily due to breast compression, can serve as major deterrents to participation in routine screening programs. Psychological factors such as anxiety, fear, and pain catastrophizing have been shown to influence pain perception and experience during mammography. These factors may affect women's decisions to participate in or avoid screening, undermining public health efforts for early detection. Objective: This study aims to synthesize the scientific literature on the psychological factors influencing pain perception and experience in women undergoing mammography. Methods: This systematic review protocol is in accordance with the 2015 PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials and observational designs that examine psychological factors-such as anxiety, catastrophizing, and related constructs-in relation to pain perception and experience among women undergoing screening or diagnostic mammography. The primary outcome is women's perception and experience of pain during mammography, and the role of psychological factors may influence it, while secondary outcomes include pain intensity and pain-related distress, measured with validated pain scales or self-reported questionnaires. There will be no restriction on publication year, but only peer-reviewed, full-text articles in English will be included. Gray literature will be excluded. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO using database-specific strategies with keywords and Boolean operators; reference lists of included studies will also be screened. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data will be synthesized narratively, with thematic grouping of psychological factors and tabulation of study characteristics. Due to anticipated heterogeneity across populations, study designs, and outcome measures, a meta-analysis will not be feasible; instead, greater interpretive weight will be given to findings from studies judged to have a lower risk of bias. Results: The database search has been completed in September 2025. Data extraction and organization into summary tables are scheduled to be finished by December 2025, followed by a narrative synthesis of findings. The systematic review manuscript is planned for submission to a peer-reviewed journal in January 2026. Conclusions: This protocol outlines the first systematic review to comprehensively investigate women's perception and experience of pain during mammography and the psychological factors, such as anxiety, depression, fear, and coping strategies, that may influence it. The review aims to generate evidence-based insights that will inform clinical practice and guide the development of targeted interventions designed to reduce discomfort, improve screening experiences, and increase participation in breast cancer screening programs. The authors also plan to disseminate the findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyPain PerceptionAnxietyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicanxietybreast cancer screeningpainpain catastrophizingpsychological factorscreening mammography

Identifiers

PMID41223381
PMCPMC12611228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.