ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Psychological Factors Influencing Pain Perception and Experience in Women Undergoing Mammography: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological Factors and Personality Traits Influencing the Experience and Perception of Pain in Women Undergoing Mammography: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Social Media Discourse on Breast Cancer Screening Barriers in Japanese and English: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Mammographic screening significantly improves the early detection and survival rates. However, the pain and discomfort experienced during mammography, primarily due to breast compression, can serve as major deterrents to participation in routine screening programs. Psychological factors such as anxiety, fear, and pain catastrophizing have been shown to influence pain perception and experience during mammography. These factors may affect women's decisions to participate in or avoid screening, undermining public health efforts for early detection. Objective: This study aims to synthesize the scientific literature on the psychological factors influencing pain perception and experience in women undergoing mammography. Methods: This systematic review protocol is in accordance with the 2015 PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials and observational designs that examine psychological factors-such as anxiety, catastrophizing, and related constructs-in relation to pain perception and experience among women undergoing screening or diagnostic mammography. The primary outcome is women's perception and experience of pain during mammography, and the role of psychological factors may influence it, while secondary outcomes include pain intensity and pain-related distress, measured with validated pain scales or self-reported questionnaires. There will be no restriction on publication year, but only peer-reviewed, full-text articles in English will be included. Gray literature will be excluded. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO using database-specific strategies with keywords and Boolean operators; reference lists of included studies will also be screened. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data will be synthesized narratively, with thematic grouping of psychological factors and tabulation of study characteristics. Due to anticipated heterogeneity across populations, study designs, and outcome measures, a meta-analysis will not be feasible; instead, greater interpretive weight will be given to findings from studies judged to have a lower risk of bias. Results: The database search has been completed in September 2025. Data extraction and organization into summary tables are scheduled to be finished by December 2025, followed by a narrative synthesis of findings. The systematic review manuscript is planned for submission to a peer-reviewed journal in January 2026. Conclusions: This protocol outlines the first systematic review to comprehensively investigate women's perception and experience of pain during mammography and the psychological factors, such as anxiety, depression, fear, and coping strategies, that may influence it. The review aims to generate evidence-based insights that will inform clinical practice and guide the development of targeted interventions designed to reduce discomfort, improve screening experiences, and increase participation in breast cancer screening programs. The authors also plan to disseminate the findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.