ArticlePloS one2025
Chinese influence in Africa by integrated regret theory and multi-criteria decision analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study illuminates the multifaceted influence of Chinese in Africa, driven by the imperative to understand the strategic and economic ramifications of this rapidly evolving relationship. Motivated by the critical role Africa plays in global geopolitics and resource dynamics, alongside Chinese expanding international influences, the research aims to quantitatively and psychologically assess the decision-making processes underpinning this engagement. Adopting a regret theory-based Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework, the study evaluates Chinese impact across 49 African countries from 2018 to 2022, employing six economic indicators to capture the breadth of Chinese activities. Through meticulous normalization, regret utility computation, and total gap analysis, the methodology affords a systematic ranking that reflects the varying degrees of Chinese economic influence. The findings uncover pronounced variances in the level of Chinese engagement across the continent, with countries like Nigeria and Egypt showcasing substantial influence convergence with the theoretical model of ideal economic partnership, whereas others like Cape Verde indicate minimal influence. Contributing to academic and practical discourse, this study not only provides a methodological blueprint for analyzing geopolitical influences but also offers insights that policymakers can leverage to optimize their engagement strategies with Chinese. It foregrounds the interplay between empirical economic data and behavioral economics within international relations research. The study acknowledges limitations, primarily in data availability, which may not capture the full scope of informal economic interactions. It proposes further research to enrich the understanding of the Chinese-Africa nexus through longitudinal studies, integration of qualitative data, and expansion of the analytical model to encompass broader socio-economic impacts and more diverse indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.