ArticlePloS one2025
Greenness and its interaction with air pollution in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer risk in UK Biobank.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is unclear if natural vegetation (greenness) is associated with breast cancer breast cancer risk and if it interacts with air pollution. We investigated the associations of greenness with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, and the extent to which the association of the air pollutant PM10 with breast cancer differs by greenness level. Of the 154,804 postmenopausal women included in the study, 6,131 developed breast cancer after the baseline assessment for enrollment into the UK Biobank. Data on greenness measures, and established breast cancer risk factors were available at baseline assessment (2006-2010), while data for PM10 were available from 2007 and 2010. We used Cox proportional hazards models to assess adjusted associations between greenness and breast cancer risk. We also examined associations of PM10 with breast cancer risk by greenness levels and their interactions. For each 0.1 unit increase in NDVI, we found a 2.6% increase in breast cancer risk (Hazard ratio [HR]=1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05). We also found evidence of a significant interaction, with stronger association between cumulative average PM10 and breast cancer risk at lower NDVI levels (1st quartile NDVI: HR per 10 µg/m3 PM10 = 3.03, 95%CI 1.98-4.64) versus higher NDVI levels (4th quartile: HR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.98). We did not find interactions with other greenness measures. Our results suggest that various measures of greenness differ in their association with breast cancer and that there may be an interaction between greenness and PM10 exposure in relation to breast cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.