Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41223157›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effects of primary calcium source on phytase efficiency in weaned piglets.

Xiaonan Guan, Adam Smith, Hengxiao Zhai, Francesc Molist, Liz Vanessa Lagos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaonan GuanSchothorst Feed Research, 8200 AM Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Adam Smithdsm-firmenich Nutritional Products (UK) Ltd, Heanor, Derbyshire, United Kingdom.
Hengxiao Zhaidsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition Research Center, Bazhou, China.
Francesc MolistSchothorst Feed Research, 8200 AM Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Liz Vanessa LagosSchothorst Feed Research, 8200 AM Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An 18-d experiment tested the hypothesis that using calcium formate (Ca-formate) instead of limestone in piglet diets, lowers the dietary buffering capacity, reduces stomach pH, and improves phytase efficiency. At weaning (29.8 ± 1.10 d), 60 boars (body weight 8.8 ± 0.31 kg) housed in metabolism crates were allotted to a randomized complete block design with 10 experimental diets and 2 weaning rounds. Diets were formulated following a 5 × 2 factorial design with 5 dietary treatments (Trt) and 2 main Ca sources (limestone or Ca-formate). The 5 Trt included a positive control diet [PC; 0.76% Ca, 0.34% standardized total tract digestible (STTD) P] and 4 negative control diets (NC; 0.56% Ca, 0.21% STTD P) supplemented with phytase at 0, 750, 1,500, and 3,000 FYT/kg. At day 10, piglets were individually housed to allow fecal and urine sample collection. On days 0, 7, and 18, blood samples were collected. At day 18, samples of gastrointestinal content and the metacarpus were collected, and apparent jejunal, ileal, and total tract digestibility (AJD, AID, and ATTD) of Ca and P was calculated. Digestibility and blood data were analyzed as a 2-way and 3-way interaction, respectively. Phytase dose-response regressions for ATTD Ca and P concentrations were performed per Ca source. Regardless of Trt, Ca source did not affect stomach pH, but Ca-formate diets had greater AID and ATTD of Ca (+5.7% and 3.6%; P < 0.01) and lower AID and ATTD of P (-3.2% and 2.4%; P < 0.01) than limestone diets. Increasing phytase levels increased the ATTD and AID of Ca and P (P < 0.01). An interaction between Trt and Ca source was observed for AJD of P (P < 0.01). There was no effect of Ca source, except at 750 FYT, where the Ca-formate diet had lower AJD of P than the limestone diet. Based on the dose-response analyses, to reach a dietary ATTD P of 3.84 g/kg, 1,232 and 1,944 FYT are needed in the limestone and Ca-formate diets, respectively. Compared with the NC, increasing levels of phytase and the PC diet increased serum P (mg/L) and P retention (%), phytase inclusion increased plasma inositol (µmol), but only the PC diet increased bone ash (g/kg; Trt main effect; P < 0.001). In conclusion, replacing limestone with Ca-formate does not lower stomach pH, increases Ca but reduces P digestibility, and decreases phytase efficiency, likely due to greater Ca solubility, which induces the formation of insoluble Ca-P-phytate complexes. This highlights the importance of considering a digestible Ca system in piglet diets.

Indexed as

6-PhytaseCalciumCalcium, DietaryFormatesAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCalcium CarbonateDietDietary SupplementsDigestionDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleRandom AllocationSwineWeaning6-PhytaseCalciumCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryFormatesformic acidbone ashcalcium formatelimestonemineral digestibilityphytaseweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID41223157
PMCPMC12657462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.