ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Exploring the role of patient activity in the clinical decision-making processes of health care practitioners working in hospital care: A qualitative study.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the role of patient activity in the clinical decision-making processes of various health care practitioners working in hospital care.DesignQualitative research study.SettingThe study was conducted in the hospital care setting of UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.ParticipantsHealth Care Practitioners working in the hospital setting were selected through purposive sampling. Doctors, nurses, and physiotherapists were included if their professional activity centered on inpatient care, they had worked in the hospital for over four weeks and were not students in the department.Main measuresData were collected through observations and interviews. Interview recordings were transcribed, and both the interview transcripts and observation fieldnotes were coded and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's approach. Themes were iteratively reviewed and refined, leading to the development of core themes, which were constructed by synthesizing subthemes and examining their interrelationships.ResultsThe study involved forty-two participants working at UMC Utrecht. Four core themes were identified: 1) Patient activity influences clinical decision-making, 2) clinical decision-making influences patient activity, 3) multidisciplinary dynamics influence how patient activity is valued in clinical decisions, and 4) limited use of objective measurements influences how patient activity informs clinical decisions.ConclusionThis study explores the complex interaction between clinical decision-making and patient activity and how patient activity is integrated from a multidisciplinary perspective in the hospital setting. The results highlight the importance of interdisciplinary communication, barriers and facilitators for improved decision-making and examines both implicit and explicit processes involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.