ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2025
Optimizing Extended Tight-Binding Methods for Metal-Surface Interactions.
Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extensions to Extended Tight-Binding Methods for Transition-Metal Containing Systems.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Optimizing Extended Tight-Binding Methods for Metal-Surface Interactions.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate description of metal-water interfaces is essential for understanding processes in heterogeneous catalysis, electrochemistry, and surface science. Capturing the delicate balance between electrostatic and charge-transfer interactions in these systems, while efficiently sampling configurations to locate minima or approximate thermodynamic ensembles, requires electronic-structure methods that are both accurate and computationally efficient. Density functional tight-binding methods have the potential to strike the right balance, and here we demonstrate how systematic parameter optimization within the GFN1-xTB framework improves the description of water-metal interactions. Using previously published reference data for five metals (Cu, Ag, Au, Pd, Pt) and their (100) and (111) facets, we explore various adsorption sites, orientations, and distances. Sobol sensitivity analysis identifies the most influential parameters for each system, which are then optimized to minimize errors in adsorption energies. This targeted optimization yields substantial accuracy gains, reducing root-mean-square errors by approximately 20-60%. The modified method provides reliable predictions for catalytic studies where the default parameterization can fail qualitatively. However, such improvements come at the cost of reduced transferability across systems and properties, emphasizing that parameter optimization must be carefully tailored to the specific chemical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.