Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222989›Full record

ArticleNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS2026

"We Were on Our Own": Animal Slaughtering and Processing Industry Workers' Perspectives on Workplace Health and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in North Carolina.

Carolyn Gigot, Zachary Smith, Kirsten Koehler, Georgia J Michlig, Devon J Hall, Christopher D Heaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolyn GigotDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-5539
Zachary SmithDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8889-1495
Kirsten KoehlerDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Georgia J MichligDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Devon J HallRural Empowerment Association for Community Help, Warsaw, NC, USA.
Christopher D HeaneyDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

ECHODAC (Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes Data Analysis Center)U24OD023382 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Diane J Catellier, LISA P JACOBSON · 2016 to 2026
$148.4M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES032756 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Marsha Wills-Karp · 2022 to 2026
$6.0M
Antimicrobial resistant E. coli before and after California Senate bill 27 (ARES): a natural experimentR01AI130066 · NIAID · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TARTOF, SARA · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
Arsenic and immune response to influenza vaccination in pregnant women and newbornsR01ES026973 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEANEY, CHRISTOPHER D, LABRIQUE, ALAIN BERNARD · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Multiplex oral fluid antibody assay for arbovirus diagnosis, surveillance and preventionR21AI139784 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COLLINS, MATTHEW, HEANEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2018 to 2019
$459k
Development of a point of care lateral flow diagnostic to test for acute and past hepatitis E (HEV) in salivaR43AI141265 · NIAID · NANOCOMPOSIX, INC. · PI BALDWIN, RICHARD KIMO, PISANIC, NORA · 2018 to 2018
$225k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130066NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI139784NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI141265NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES032756NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026973NIH HHS U24 OD023382NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH012297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers in the animal slaughtering and processing industry have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our mixed methods study aimed to describe worker experiences during the pandemic, focusing on workplace health and safety. We surveyed 69 animal slaughtering and processing workers in North Carolina between April 2021 and July 2022 and conducted in-depth interviews with 9 workers between July 2022 and April 2023. Nearly all survey participants reported their employers provided (94%) and required (90%) face masks, but fewer reported engineering or administrative controls. Interviewed participants described production as management's priority, over health and safety; difficulty taking time off when ill; inadequate communication from management; and an overall sense that "we were on our own" in maintaining health and safety at work, especially later during the pandemic. Though unlikely under the current administration, an enforceable Occupational Safety and Health Administration infectious disease standard, including appropriate policies for isolation and paid time off, could help protect worker health.

Indexed as

AbattoirsCOVID-19Occupational HealthAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceanimal slaughtering and processingCOVID-19infectious diseasemixed methodsoccupational safety

Identifiers

PMID41222989
PMCPMC12720249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.