Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222858›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2025

A hitchhiker's guide to modern, practical cyanobacterial taxonomy.

Petr Dvořák, Svatopluk Skoupý, Aleksandar Stanojković, Jeffrey R Johansen, Chelsea Villanueva, Patrick Jung, Laura Briegel-Williams, H Dail Laughinghouse, Forrest W Lefler, David E Berthold and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Petr DvořákDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-9566
Svatopluk SkoupýDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-1544
Aleksandar StanojkovićDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jeffrey R JohansenDepartment of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-9417
Chelsea VillanuevaDepartment of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8969-5747
Patrick JungExtreme Cryptogam Ecology Lab, University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-3906
Laura Briegel-WilliamsExtreme Cryptogam Ecology Lab, University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
H Dail LaughinghouseFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-6948
Forrest W LeflerFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-3003
David E BertholdFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.
Jan KaštovskýDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-3468
Anne C HurleyDepartment of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Dale A CasamattaDepartment of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-0715

Funding

Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 23-06507S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an explosion of new Cyanobacterial taxa described within the last two decades. Cyanobacteria exhibit incredible ecological versatility and morphological variability, and thousands of species have already been described using "traditional" approaches (e.g., morphological features). However, DNA sequencing and other molecular tools have provided extensive evidence that the diversity of cyanobacteria is not necessarily congruent with morphology, as many morphological genera (e.g., Phormidium, Leptolyngbya, and Nostoc) are polyphyletic, and species within the genera are often morphologically indistinguishable, thus cryptic. Further confounding systematic assessments, newly erected taxa are often based on a single strain with one or two 16S rRNA gene sequences, may have incomplete formal descriptions, and lack indication of the employed species concepts. Here we have proposed a set of guidelines for cyanobacterial taxonomists. We have focused on the whole process of erecting new taxa: sampling, sequencing (including genomes), phylogenetic inference, phenotype characterization, species concepts, formal descriptions, and codes of nomenclature. Our hope is that these guidelines will help with the laborious but ever-rewarding task of identifying and describing the taxa within the world of cyanobacteria.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaClassificationPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SbioinformaticscyanobacteriaITSsystematicstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID41222858
PMCPMC12718434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.