Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222853›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of testing for alemtuzumab antidrug antibodies to guide treatment in multiple sclerosis: a modelling study.

Timothy Jamieson, Florian Tomini, Sharmilee Gnanapavan, Borislava Mihaylova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy JamiesonHealth Economic and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. t.jamieson@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-8888
Florian TominiHealth Economic and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sharmilee GnanapavanBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Borislava MihaylovaHealth Economic and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Invention for Innovation NIHR201645NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London 203330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic therapies are increasingly used in multiple sclerosis (MS), but often provoke anti-drug antibodies, potentially leading to treatment failure. Testing for anti-drug antibodies to guide treatment switching could improve clinical- and cost- effectiveness of MS treatment. We assess the value of testing for anti-drug antibodies to alemtuzumab, an effective but immunogenic MS therapy. We developed a microsimulation model to project disease progression, quality of life, and cost outcomes in people with relapsing-remitting MS initiating alemtuzumab treatment without and with alemtuzumab anti-body testing. Risk of anti-drug antibody development was informed by a UK cohort study of alemtuzumab-treated people with MS. UK guidance informed MS treatment strategies. Alemtuzumab anti-drug antibody test-directed treatment switching resulted in 0.02 fewer MS relapses per person; prolonged time to secondary progressive disease by 0.06 years; and yielded 0.02 additional years of life (0.06 Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY)). At £25/test, incremental cost per QALY gained was £47,861, with the additional cost arising from increased time on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Cost-effectiveness of anti-drug antibody testing was sensitive to anti-drug antibody development risk, their impact on drug efficacy, and costs of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Anti-drug antibody testing to inform MS treatment switching could improve clinical outcomes, but its cost-effectiveness depends on anti-drug antibody risk, its impact on drug efficacy, and costs of DMTs.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabAntibodiesMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeUnited KingdomAlemtuzumabAntibodiesAlemtuzumabAnti-drug antibodies testingCost-effectivenessDisease-modifying therapiesMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID41222853
PMCPMC13350217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.