ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Mapping of the EORTC QLQ-LC43 to EQ-5D-5 L index in patients with lung cancer: comparison of traditional regression models with machine learning technique.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to create a mapping algorithm by utilizing traditional regression analyses and a machine learning approach to estimate EQ-5D-5 L values based on EORTC QLQ-LC43 data in the absence of direct EQ-5D-5 L measurements.
methodsData for EQ-5D-5 L and EORTC QLQ-LC43 were collected from patients with lung cancer at the Departments of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology at Sichuan Cancer Hospital. Mapping algorithms were applied using the ordinary least squares model (OLS), Tobit model, Beta mixture regression (BM), the adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (ALDVMM), and ridge regression (RR) as a machine learning model to map QLQ-LC43 results based on EQ-5D-5 L scores. To develop these models, dimension scores, squared items, and interaction items were incorporated. Performance metrics, including R², root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to identify the optimal model. The stability of the models was assessed using five-fold cross-validation (CV).
resultsThe Beta mixture regression model (BETAMIX M1A), incorporating all dimensions of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 as covariates, exhibited the best mapping performance. The final prediction metrics were R²=0.816, RMSE = 0.125, MAE = 0.083, AIC=-717.810, and BIC=-482.609. The BM model has good explanatory ability and low prediction error. Five-fold cross-validation (CV) results also demonstrated that the BM model had the best mapping power.
conclusionsThis study developed an optimized mapping algorithm to predict the utility index from the QLQ-LC43 to the EQ-5D-5 L, offering an effective alternative for estimating EQ-5D-5 L values when preference-based health utility data are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.