ArticleMaternal and child health journal2026
Legal Reform to Address Key Drivers of Racial Inequities in Maternal Health: A Multi-method Analysis of California Laws & Regulations from 2019 to 2023.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCalifornia has taken various actions with the goal of advancing maternal health equity. We analyze recent California laws and regulations using a novel conceptual model to understand whether and how they target expert-identified drivers of inequities in maternal health.
methodsUsing policy review and deductive thematic analysis, we evaluated whether recent state laws and regulations in California sought to directly intervene on healthcare-based drivers of racial inequities in maternal health as conceptualized by a CDC-convened expert workgroup.
resultsWe identified 13 laws/regulations enacted between 2019-2023 that aimed to improve maternal health. All intervened on one or more healthcare-based drivers of inequities. Two (15%) targeted Driver 1 - Problems in communication, stereotyping, and other interpersonal interactions, resulting from interpersonal racism, by e.g., requiring provider anti-bias training. One (8%) targeted Driver 2 - Differential and/or suboptimal treatment for minoritized populations within healthcare settings (e.g., lower-quality care, inequitable burdens of hospital policies; resulting from institutional racism), by making reporting discrimination easier for patients. Twelve (92%) targeted Driver 3 - Lack of resources and/or policies that could support the health and healthcare of minoritized populations, stemming from structural racism, by e.g., expanding access to midwifery and doula care or diversifying the maternal health workforce. DISCUSSION: California's recent maternal health-focused laws/regulations have primarily targeted inadequate or inequitable structural resources (Driver 3). Few directly intervened on Drivers 1 or 2. These findings provide a useful grounding for future policy research and reveal the advantages of assessing policies in terms of mechanism-focused intervention targets. Policy implications and potential levers are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.