ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Automatic system calibration for orthognathic robot system.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSystem calibration, including hand-robot and robot-world calibration, is an essential step that directly influences the location accuracy of surgical robots. Conventional calibration methods for orthognathic robot systems (ORSs) face significant challenges in handling irregularly shaped end tools, leading to manual intervention and compromised accuracy. Therefore, an automatic method has been proposed to improve the calibration efficiency and accuracy of ORSs.
methodsThe core innovation of the proposed method lies in enabling automation of both pre-intraoperative image registration and robotic hand-eye calibration, via aligning the 3D model of irregularly shaped tools to the preoperative CT space. It can effectively minimize errors caused by manual intervention. firstly, the equations of hand-eye-tool calibration were reconstructed using the preoperative graphic information to define tool endpoints (TEPs). Then, the transformation matrices were solved via a robust optimization method based on least squares. finally, the whole calibration process was completed automatically with robot path planning without human involvement.
resultsA group of simulated robot-assisted orthognathic surgery experiments was performed. The proposed method achieved a calibration error of 1.04 ± 0.54 mm, and the total execution error were reduced to 1.56 ± 0.61 mm.
conclusionThe experimental results proved that the proposed calibration method could not only automate the calibration process, but also effectively improve the accuracy and stability of the system. It is expected to pave the way for more autonomous and efficient surgical procedures. Also, there are some limitations need to be overcome, including dependency on marker-based tracking and small sample size. Future work will integrate markerless tracking and machine learning for further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.