ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026
Impact of prophylactic drain placement on intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy: nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of drain placement on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrectomy.
backgroundThe effectiveness of prophylactic abdominal drain placement in gastrectomy remains unclear. Nevertheless, they are still commonly used following gastrectomy.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2014 and March 2022 were included. We applied overlap weighting based on propensity scores to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the incidence of intra-abdominal infections. Secondary outcomes included postoperative percutaneous drainage, in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.
resultsA total of 217,750 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 196,660 (90.3%) received prophylactic abdominal drains. After overlap weighting, the drain group had a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal infections compared to the no-drain group (6.3% vs. 7.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.7 to - 1.0). The prophylactic drains were also associated with reduced in-hospital postoperative mortality (0.6% vs. 0.8%; 95% CI - 0.3 to - 0.1). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative percutaneous drainage or hospital stay duration.
conclusionThis study suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage was associated with a reduced incidence of intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy without increasing hospitalization duration or medical costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.