SynthesisAdvances in therapy2026
Early Change in Proteinuria as a Surrogate Endpoint in Studies of IgA Nephropathy: An Updated Patient-Level Meta-analysis and Discussion of Appropriate Methodology.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- APRIL-targeted and dual BAFF/APRIL blockade in primary IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Measuring effectiveness in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: what are we looking for?Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImmunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is a rare renal condition associated with a high risk of kidney failure. However, conducting phase 3 clinical trials with kidney failure as a primary endpoint is generally not feasible because of sample size and protracted follow-up requirements. Hence, surrogate outcomes are necessary when assessing new treatments in randomized controlled trials. Previous meta-analyses have assessed the validity of early change in proteinuria as a surrogate endpoint, and the present research updates the analysis with additional patient-level data.
methodsThe same methodology as two previously published individual patient-level meta-analyses was used, with additional data from the PROTECT study included. Early change in proteinuria was defined as change from baseline at 9 months, and the clinical endpoint was defined as the composite of doubling of serum creatinine level, kidney failure or death. The association of treatment effects was ascertained using individual patient data via a Bayesian mixed-effect regression model to relate treatment effects on the clinical outcome to treatment effects on proteinuria with study as the unit of analysis.
resultsThe updated individual patient-level meta-analysis including data from PROTECT resulted in an overall slope of 1.03 (95% Bayesian credible interval - 0.40 to 2.34) between treatment effects on early change in proteinuria versus longer-term treatment effects on the clinical outcome, with an R
conclusionsThe FDA and EMA have accepted proteinuria as a valid surrogate outcome for use in clinical trials of new interventions for the treatment of IgA nephropathy, and the present analysis provides further indications that interventions that reduce proteinuria in a short-term trial are likely to improve kidney outcomes over the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.