ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Preoperative prediction of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery: a machine learning approach.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative complications during cataract surgery, while uncommon, can significantly impact visual outcomes and identifying high-risk patients preoperatively improves surgical planning and supports personalized care. This study presents an early application of advanced machine learning (ML) models for predicting multiple intraoperative complications using routine preoperative data.
methodsWe analyzed 3,957 cataract surgeries performed at a tertiary hospital and developed four ML models, XGBoost, Random Forest, CatBoost and TabPFN, to classify cases into three categories: no complications, posterior capsule rupture/vitreous loss and other complications. To address class imbalance due to the predominance of uncomplicated cases, random undersampling was applied during training. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was used to interpret feature importance.
resultsTabPFN achieved the highest AUC score (0.62), followed closely by Random Forest and CatBoost (0.61 each), with Random Forest also demonstrating the highest F1-score (0.46). SHAP analysis highlighted age, tamsulosin use and surgeon experience as key predictors.
conclusionThis study provides a proof of concept for the feasibility of using machine learning for preoperative risk modeling of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery. While predictive performance was modest, validation on larger or external datasets is encouraged to further assess its potential role in surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.