Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222768›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

Preoperative prediction of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery: a machine learning approach.

Michail Angelos Gkikas, Konstantinos Vrettos, Ioannis Tsinopoulos, Argyrios Tzamalis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michail Angelos GkikasMaster's Program in Ocular Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. angelo.gkikas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5265-7432
Konstantinos VrettosArtificial Intelligence and Translational Imaging (ATI) Lab, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, 71003, Heraklion, Greece.
Ioannis TsinopoulosMaster's Program in Ocular Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Argyrios TzamalisMaster's Program in Ocular Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative complications during cataract surgery, while uncommon, can significantly impact visual outcomes and identifying high-risk patients preoperatively improves surgical planning and supports personalized care. This study presents an early application of advanced machine learning (ML) models for predicting multiple intraoperative complications using routine preoperative data.

methodsWe analyzed 3,957 cataract surgeries performed at a tertiary hospital and developed four ML models, XGBoost, Random Forest, CatBoost and TabPFN, to classify cases into three categories: no complications, posterior capsule rupture/vitreous loss and other complications. To address class imbalance due to the predominance of uncomplicated cases, random undersampling was applied during training. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was used to interpret feature importance.

resultsTabPFN achieved the highest AUC score (0.62), followed closely by Random Forest and CatBoost (0.61 each), with Random Forest also demonstrating the highest F1-score (0.46). SHAP analysis highlighted age, tamsulosin use and surgeon experience as key predictors.

conclusionThis study provides a proof of concept for the feasibility of using machine learning for preoperative risk modeling of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery. While predictive performance was modest, validation on larger or external datasets is encouraged to further assess its potential role in surgical planning.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionIntraoperative ComplicationsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsArtificial intelligenceCataract surgeryComplicationsIntraoperativeMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.