ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Automatic segmentation and measurement of tongue geometric features using TOSA-Net for obstructive sleep apnoea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe tongue is a critical soft tissue of the upper airway; excessive enlargement can narrow or collapse the airway, contributing to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). To our knowledge, no existing methods quantify OSA-related tongue geometric features using deep learning segmentation. We present a deep learning model (TOSA-Net) capable of accurately segmenting and measuring tongue geometry, offering a more efficient approach for future OSA tongue research. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset (n = 207) of front and profile tongue images, along with manually segmented and quantified tongue dimensions, was used for model development and evaluation. We modified a U-Net architecture using multi-scale convolution filters for feature extraction. Automated segmentations were used to calculate tongue geometric features. Dice coefficient, Pearson correlation, agreement analyses, and expert-derived clinical parameters assessed segmentation and measurement accuracy between deep learning and manual methods.
resultsFive-fold cross-validation yielded a mean Dice coefficient of 0.870 across all subjects, with the highest mean Dice (0.914) in OSA patients. Tongue features (area, length, thickness, curvature) showed strong correlation with manual measurements, with no statistically significant differences [Formula: see text]).
conclusionThe high accuracy of automated segmentation and measurement indicates the proposed method's potential to replace time-consuming manual tasks in clinical and large-scale OSA research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.