ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Predictors of failed reduction after prosthetic hip dislocation.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProsthetic hip dislocation remains one of the most common complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA), often managed with closed reduction under procedural sedation. This study aimed to evaluate how sedation strategy, procedural location, and patient-specific factors influence the success of closed reduction in prosthetic hip dislocations. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI), use of dissociative agents, and emergency department (ED) setting would be associated with lower reduction success.
methodsA retrospective review was performed of adults presenting with prosthetic hip dislocations to two tertiary centers (2014-2024). Demographic, procedural, and pharmacologic data were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between reduction success and location, sedation class, BMI, and procedural duration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified thresholds for escalation.
resultsAmong 201 reduction encounters (111 patients), overall success was 73.1% (ED 54.3%, OR 94.4%). In multivariable analysis, non-ED location was the dominant predictor of success (OR 38.4, 95% CI 8.0-184; p < 0.001), while no medication class independently predicted outcome. Procedure duration was inversely associated with success in the ED (OR 0.88 per minute; p = 0.047), with an escalation threshold of approximately 25 min (AUC 0.72). BMI, age, comorbidities, and implant type were not associated with reduction success.
conclusionThis study demonstrated reduction location was the dominant predictor of success, with non-ED settings demonstrating substantially higher odds of achieving closed reduction. Longer procedure duration was inversely associated with success, suggesting that protracted or repeated attempts should prompt early operative escalation. Standardized sedation protocols, adequate muscle relaxation, and algorithmic triage for high-risk cases may enhance success rates and reduce resource utilization in the management of prosthetic hip dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.