Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222657›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Artificial intelligence in fracture diagnostics : Potentials and challenges in the clinical practice].

Christoph Endler, Julian A Luetkens, Sebastian Nowak

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph EndlerKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Christoph.endler@ukbonn.de.
Julian A LuetkensKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Sebastian NowakKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma surgery and emergency medical care are facing growing challenges: rising patient numbers, a shortage of specialists and a high diagnostic workload are leading to diagnostic errors, up to 80% of which relate to overlooked fractures. Systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) for fracture diagnostics offer promising support in this context. Modern deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional neural networks, achieve high sensitivities and specificities in the detection of frequent fractures in large validation studies. As a "second reader", they increase diagnostic accuracy, reduce diagnostic time and improve patient safety, especially in the case of subtle fractures or limited practitioner experience. Additional applications include automated triage, angle measurements, bone age determination and the detection of other pathologies. Limitations include heterogeneous training data, limited performance in complex fractures and regulatory requirements. The continuous technological development promises increasing performance and broader fields of application for AI in fracture diagnostics. Future systems will also increasingly enable multimodal and 3D analyses as well as deeper integration into the clinical workflow. The use of AI does not replace physicians but acts as an assistive tool to increase quality and efficiency; however, further independent, prospective and patient-orientated studies and integration into clinical guidelines are required for a broad implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFractures, BoneDeep LearningHumansDeep learningDiagnostic errorsDiagnostic imagingPatient safetyTrauma surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.