ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
Enhanced methyl tertiary butyl ether degradation and electricity generation in microbial fuel cells using a modified anode and additives.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to improve methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) degradation and power production in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) by employing an iron nanoparticle-coated graphite carbon electrode (Fe-GCE), co-metabolites (sodium acetate (SAC) and glucose (GLS)), and surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)). Fe-GCE enhanced the roughness and hydrophilicity of the electrodes, thereby promoting their electrochemical activity. This study compared the use of polyvinyl alcohol/glutaraldehyde (PVA/GA) and Nafion 117 membranes and the impact of carbon sources and surfactants on the performance of MFCs. The optimal conditions achieved 97.9% MTBE removal (10 mg/L) within 96 h by employing SAC and SDS in Nafion 117-MFC with a voltage of 335 mV in synthetic wastewater. Fe-GCE exhibited minimal antibacterial action and iron leaching (< 0.3 mg/L in 30 days), suggesting its stability during wastewater treatment. Bacterial community profiling revealed that Bacillus, Alcaligenes, Trichococcus, and Magnetospirillum were the main MTBE degraders. Statistical analysis validated substantial improvement in MTBE removal and voltage yield with the use of additives, and that PVA/GA-MFC had performance similar to Nafion 117-MFC, providing a cost-effective alternative with potential commercial success. This study provides insights into the potential use of MFCs for treating recalcitrant pollutants while producing green energy, paving the way for eco-friendly waste management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.