Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222639›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Evaluation of neck metastases in T1N0 lip cancers.

Gökhan Akgül, Hande Arslan, Samet Aydemir, Birol Taş, Dursun Mehmet Mehel, Esra Yılmaz, Doğukan Özdemir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gökhan AkgülDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences Turkey- Samsun University Turkey- Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Kadıköy Mah. Park Sok. No: 199, Samsun, İlkadım, 55090, Turkey. g.akgul-57@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-6585
Hande ArslanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences Turkey- Samsun University Turkey- Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Kadıköy Mah. Park Sok. No: 199, Samsun, İlkadım, 55090, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-2712
Samet AydemirDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences Turkey- Samsun University Turkey- Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Kadıköy Mah. Park Sok. No: 199, Samsun, İlkadım, 55090, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-1808
Birol TaşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-7661
Dursun Mehmet MehelUniversity of Health Sciences, Samsun Training and Research Hospital Otolaryngology, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-3393
Esra YılmazFaculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-7306
Doğukan ÖzdemirFaculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-163X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the histopathological features and mid-term follow-up outcomes of patients with T1N0 lip squamous cell carcinoma who underwent or did not undergo neck dissection.

methodsA total of 66 patients who underwent surgical treatment for T1N0 lip cancer were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: those who did not undergo neck dissection (group 1, n = 31) and those who did (group 2, n = 35). The specific characteristics of these two groups were examined histopathologically, and the patients' postoperative follow-up was evaluated in terms of local recurrence and/or delayed cervical metastases.

resultsGroup 1 included 16 female and 15 male patients, with a mean age of 69.8 ± 12 years. The mean tumor diameter was 1 ± 0.34 cm. During the follow-up period, no local recurrence was observed in this group; however, one patient developed cervical metastasis 13 months postoperatively. Group 2 consisted of 20 female and 15 male patients, with a mean age of 70.4 ± 10.7 years. The mean tumor diameter was 1.7 ± 0.33 cm. No local recurrence or metastatic lymph nodes were detected in any patient in this group. The mean follow-up duration was 39.9 ± 18.1 months for group 1 and 44.4 ± 18.6 months for group 2.

conclusionIn early-stage T1 lip cancers without clinically detectable cervical metastasis (N0) at diagnosis, treatment may be planned as excision of the primary tumor alone, without performing neck dissection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsLip NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesLip cancerNeck dissectionNeck metastasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.