ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Characterizing the safety and efficacy of injection pharyngoplasty as a treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency in adults.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough injection pharyngoplasty (IP) has been well described as a treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in the pediatric population, there are far fewer studies on its safety and effectiveness in adults with acquired VPI. Our study aims to characterize the safety and efficacy of IP as a treatment for acquired VPI in adults while identifying underlying VPI etiologies and injection characteristics that are associated with positive outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 adult patients with acquired VPI who were treated with IP. We collected data on patient demographics, etiology of acquired VPI, and IP procedural characteristics for analysis. Descriptive statistics are provided for patient demographic and IP procedural characteristics.
resultsIn our cohort, 16 patients had a history of radiation and/or chemotherapy while 14 patients had acquired VPI due to other etiologies. A majority of patients (n = 16) in our study had their VPI resolved with a single injection. Of all 61 injections recorded in our cohort, the most frequent injection agent was calcium hydroxyapatite (n = 35) followed by autologous fat (n = 15). We found that 27 of the patients in our cohort reported improvement in their acquired VPI after IP with only 9 reporting temporary minor complications that were resolved without intervention.
conclusionOur study further establishes IP as a safe and effective procedure for adult patients with acquired VPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.