Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222634›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Role of machine learning segmentation method based on CT images in preoperative staging of oral cavity cancer.

Sermin Can, Giovanni Succo, Cengiz Coskun, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz, Mehmet Akdag

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sermin CanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Clinic, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey. sermin.can@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2688-4927
Giovanni SuccoOncology Department, Head and Neck Cancer Unit, University of Turin, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Cengiz CoskunFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Computer Engineering, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Turkey.
Mehmet Hakan KorkmazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Private Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet AkdagFaculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Clinic, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe article aims to demonstrate, using oral cavity SCC as an example, that machine learning can accurately predict the T and N staging of OSCC, using the conventional radiologist/ surgeon interpretation of the scan as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo datasets for tumor mass and nodal metastasis were used in this study. Each of the datasets consists of 179 Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography images. A customized U-Net deep learning architecture was employed for the segmentation of tumor masses and nodal metastases. Comprehensive maps of the tumor mass and metastatic lymph nodes were generated. Following this mapping process, the dimensions of the identified lesions were measured and classified according to the Tumor and Lymph Node Metastasis classification system. The resulting classifications were then compared with those established by a radiologist to assess accuracy.

resultsThe performance metrics for tumor mass and metastasis segmentation were as follows: binary accuracy value of 98.81% and 99.58%, respectively. The accuracy values were 75.00% for tumor grade classification and 97.22% for nodal status classification.

conclusionWe emphasize that machine learning-based segmentation methods effectively predict tumor mapping and staging in oral cavity tumors, demonstrating correlation with surgeons/radiologists' assessments. As such, this model can be a diagnostic tool that supports clinicians in making informed therapeutic decisions. We foresee that, with the continuous evolution of technology, the segmentation model employed in our study will undergo significant advancements, ultimately facilitating three-dimensional tumor mapping in the near future.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellMachine LearningMouth NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingMachine learningNodal metastasisOral cavitySegmentationStage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.