ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025
Comparing functional impairments related to social network use disorder and internet gaming disorder.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The current study aimed to analyze impairments in daily life functioning (DLF) in vocational students with Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) and Social Network Use Disorder (SNUD). While diagnostic requirement for IGD has been defined and the functionally impairing nature has been demonstrated, SNUD is a relatively new phenomenon with less evidence. Methods: A diagnostic interview (n = 937) was conducted in a sample of students, of which 279 met the adapted DSM-5 criteria, with 70 reporting social networking and 29 gaming as their main activity. For screening, the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) was used and the Internet Use Disorder - Criterion-based Assessment Tool (I-CAT) served as diagnostic measure. Impairment was assessed using a subset of items taken from the WHO Disability Scale. Results: In a prior analysis, overall impairments in DLF among students with and without IUD were compared, indicating higher impairments for the IUD-group. In our study, the DSM-5 criteria appear to be appropriate to differentiate between pathological (IUD-group) and healthy internet users (non-IUD group) in terms of DLF. Odds Ratios ranged between 0.597 and 1.340 for impairments in DLF. When testing for statistical significance despite low statistical power, no differences of DLF were observed between students with IGD and SNUD in logistic regression analyses. Conclusion: The results must be regarded as preliminary and might indicate that students with IGD and SNUD show comparable impairments in DLF. However, higher sample sizes could have led to different results which needs to be investigated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.