ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning for Thermal Transport Prediction in Nanoporous Materials: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Luminescence Thermometry 2.0: Machine-Learning Temperature Read-Out with Luminescence of YOF: YbNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thermal Conductivity in Nanoporous Aerogels: A Critical Review of Gas and Solid Conduction Models and Structure-Property Relations.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming Nanomaterials Development with Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer prediction: from transparency to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the thermal properties of nanoporous materials is a major challenge that affects their applications in efficient thermal insulation and energy storage. This narrative review discusses the application of machine learning models in nanoporous materials, including covalent organic frameworks, metal-organic frameworks, aerogels, and zeolites. It discusses model advancements, with a focus on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. This includes models such as convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and physics-informed neural networks. This study also addresses the limitations of these data-driven models, including data availability, challenges in maintaining physical consistency, and difficulties in generalizing across various material families. Additionally, it covers emerging approaches such as multimodal and transfer learning, which are explored for their potential to reduce computational costs. Moreover, the benefits of interpretable machine learning methods for understanding underlying physical mechanisms are introduced and highlighted. This review provides comprehensive and practical guidelines for researchers using machine learning approaches in the study and design of nanoporous materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.