Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222371›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning for Thermal Transport Prediction in Nanoporous Materials: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Amirehsan Ghasemi, Murat Barisik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amirehsan GhasemiBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-6731
Murat BarisikBredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2413-1991

Funding

United States Department of Energy DE-SC0024510University of Tennessee at Chattanooga FY2025- 28 CEACSE-CRIU.S. National Science Foundation CBET 2442297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the thermal properties of nanoporous materials is a major challenge that affects their applications in efficient thermal insulation and energy storage. This narrative review discusses the application of machine learning models in nanoporous materials, including covalent organic frameworks, metal-organic frameworks, aerogels, and zeolites. It discusses model advancements, with a focus on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. This includes models such as convolutional neural networks, graph neural networks, and physics-informed neural networks. This study also addresses the limitations of these data-driven models, including data availability, challenges in maintaining physical consistency, and difficulties in generalizing across various material families. Additionally, it covers emerging approaches such as multimodal and transfer learning, which are explored for their potential to reduce computational costs. Moreover, the benefits of interpretable machine learning methods for understanding underlying physical mechanisms are introduced and highlighted. This review provides comprehensive and practical guidelines for researchers using machine learning approaches in the study and design of nanoporous materials.

Indexed as

aerogelsdeep learningexplainable machine learninggraph neural networksinterpretable machine learningnanoporous materialsthermal conductivitythermal transport

Identifiers

PMID41222371
PMCPMC12609288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.