Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025
Contralateral Adaptations After Unilateral Power Training in Older Adults: The Effect of Intensity of Load.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03724461 (Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contralateral Adaptations After Unilateral Power Training in Older Adults: The Effect of Intensity of Load.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of training intensity on contralateral adaptations following unilateral power-oriented resistance training (PT) in older adults. This secondary analysis of a within-person randomized controlled trial included 45 older adults (≥ 65 years; 25 women). After an 8-week control period (n = 45), part of the participants completed 12 weeks of a volume load-matched PT on one lower limb using either light loads (40% 1-RM, n = 9) or heavy loads (80% 1-RM, n = 10), while the contralateral limb did not exercise. Unilateral performance was assessed before and after each period through isometric tests (maximal isometric force, rate of force development, and muscle excitation) and dynamic tests (1-RM, maximal muscle power and maximal unloaded velocity determined through a force-velocity relationship test). Additionally, mid-thigh muscle mass and whole-body physical function were assessed. Linear mixed models were conducted to compare the effect (Cohen's d) of training intensity on the efficacy and magnitude of the contralateral adaptations and their impact on physical function. No contralateral adaptations were observed in any of the isometric tests. In contrast, untrained limbs showed comparable improvements in 1-RM (d = 0.35-0.42; p ≤ 0.001) and maximal muscle power (d = 0.49-0.54; p ≤ 0.001) regardless of PT intensity. Only heavy-load PT improved maximal unloaded velocity in the contralateral untrained limb (d = 0.68; p ≤ 0.001), while mid-thigh muscle mass (d = 0.24; p ≤ 0.013) and whole-body physical function assessed through the timed up-and-go test improved only after light-load PT (d = -0.74; p < 0.001). In conclusion, unilateral PT induced significant contralateral gains in dynamic muscle strength and power, regardless of training intensity, with heavier loads enhancing velocity-specific adaptations. Notably, light-load PT induced mild hypertrophy in the contralateral untrained limb and whole-body physical function, which might be particularly relevant for enhancing the intrinsic capacity of older adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03724461.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.