ReviewJournal of virology2025
Charting the virosphere: computational synergies of AI and bioinformatics in viral discovery and evolution.
Review in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Viral Metagenomics".Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Evolving strategies for virus discovery.Microbial genomics · 2026Review
- Cell Culture Adaptation of Porcine Group A Rotavirus: Advances and Challenges for Vaccine Development.Viruses · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bacteriophage-mediated biofilm control: a novel targeted strategy for the management of dental caries.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement of metagenomic sequencing has revealed a vast viral diversity while simultaneously exposing limitations of homology-based tools such as BLAST and HMMER, which often fail to detect highly divergent viral genomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into viromics has transformed this landscape, introducing machine learning and deep learning models-including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and transformers-that extend viral discovery beyond sequence similarity constraints. Structure-based frameworks such as AlphaFold, ESMFold, and Foldseek further enable annotation of divergent viral proteins through conserved 3D folds, while graph neural networks (GNNs) model host-virus interaction and explainable AI enhances interpretability of prediction. Despite their high sensitivity and scalability, AI-driven approaches face notable challenges: computational burden, data set bias, limited explainability, and elevated false discovery rates. This review traces the evolution of computational virology from traditional methods to AI-based and hybrid frameworks. We examine landmark AI tools while underscoring the continuing importance of phylogenetics and functional annotation in contextualizing AI predictions. We propose an integrated workflow that combines AI pattern recognition with classical bioinformatics to enhance both scalability and interpretability. By addressing the limitations of solely AI-driven or traditional approaches, this review presents a unified computational strategy to accelerate viral discovery, enhance evolutionary insights, and strengthen global preparedness for emerging infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.