ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2025
Unmasking hypoxemia: the role of standard PaO₂ in interpreting Arterial blood gas analysis.
Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the assessment of acute respiratory failure (ARF), PaO2/FIO2 ratio is widely used, but may be misleading in the presence of hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia. The standard PaO2 (stPaO2), a theoretical value corrected for PaCO2, may improve clinical interpretation of gas exchange severity.
methodsWe conducted an online survey among Italian physicians using a case vignette of three hypothetical patients with identical PaO2 values but differing PaCO2 levels. Participants were asked to rank the severity of the cases based solely on arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). A second round was offered after introducing the concept of stPaO2 and providing corresponding values.
resultsA total of 2,241 (8.9%) physicians (median age 53 years, 54.1% male) completed the first round and 1,324 (59%) completed the second one of the survey. Initially, only 9.2% correctly identified the clinical severity pattern-this increased significantly to 16.1% after introducing stPaO2 (p < 0.01). The improvement rate was higher among physicians with less than 10 years of clinical experience. Performance improved across all specialties, particularly in emergency and intensive care medicine.
conclusionsThe introduction of stPaO2 significantly enhanced physicians' ability to interpret ABG results in ARF. Although its calculation assumes ideal physiological conditions, stPaO2 remains a useful tool for unmasking hypoxemia in hyperventilating patients. Including stPaO2 in ABG reports may support more accurate clinical decision-making, particularly in emergency and critical care settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.