Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222051›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025

Acrosomal Status and PARP-1 Nuclear Markers Could Improve Discrimination of Potential Fertility in Good-Quality Boar Semen Doses.

Raquel Ausejo-Marcos, Sara Miguel-Jiménez, M Teresa Tejedor, Belén Gómez-Giménez, Cristina Soriano-Úbeda, Felipe Martinez-Pastor, Noelia Mendoza, Alejandro Vicente-Carrillo, William Fernando Hurtado, Celia Ávila Holguín and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raquel Ausejo-MarcosDepartment of Biotechnology R&D, Magapor S.L, Ejea de los Caballeros, Spain.
Sara Miguel-JiménezDepartment of Research and Development, CiencIAnova Magapor, Zaragoza, Spain.
M Teresa TejedorDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Genetics, CIBERCV, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Belén Gómez-GiménezInstitute of Animal Health and Cattle Development (INDEGSAL), University of León, León, Spain.
Cristina Soriano-ÚbedaInstitute of Animal Health and Cattle Development (INDEGSAL), University of León, León, Spain.
Felipe Martinez-PastorInstitute of Animal Health and Cattle Development (INDEGSAL), University of León, León, Spain.
Noelia MendozaDepartment of Biotechnology R&D, Magapor S.L, Ejea de los Caballeros, Spain.
Alejandro Vicente-CarrilloDepartment of Research and Development, CiencIAnova Magapor, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-1958
William Fernando HurtadoDepartment of Animal Pathology, Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Celia Ávila HolguínDepartment of Animal Pathology, Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Bernardino MorenoDepartment of Animal Pathology, Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
María Victoria FalcetoDepartment of Animal Pathology, Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive efficiency in boars partly depends on semen quality. However, it is challenging to predict sperm fertility once acceptable quality endpoints have been met. This study aims to establish a link between different semen quality parameters and farm fertility outcomes in semen doses selected for commercial use. We analysed 105 ejaculates from 15 adult Pietrain boars, extended into 45 mL artificial insemination (AI) doses. A total of 605 sows were inseminated (40.1 ± 7.8 females/boar) and fertility, farrowing rate and prolificacy data were recorded. Sperm evaluation included sperm plasma analysis, kinematics, morphology, viability, acrosome integrity, apoptotic-like changes, mitochondrial activity and DNA damage (DNA fragmentation poly-ADP ribose polymerase 1, PARP1, together with its product PAR and its cleaved form cPARP). The sperm membrane and acrosome were evaluated using the short hypo-osmotic swelling test (sHOST) and the osmotic resistance test (ORT). Fertility and farrowing rates exceeded 94%, with an average of 20.18 ± 2.03 piglets born/litter (average born alive: 87.75% ± 5.61%). Negative correlations were found between damaged acrosomes and ultrasound fertility (ρ = -0.240, p = 0.021), farrowing rate (ρ = -0.244; p = 0.019), and total born (r = -0.304; p = 0.003). Average born alive was positively correlated with plasma seminal concentrations of protein (r = 0.273; p = 0.009), fructose (r = 0.243; p = 0.024) and cathepsine B (ρ = 0.257; p = 0.029) but negatively correlated with apoptosis and DNA damage nuclear markers cPARP (r = -0.295, p = 0.005) and PAR (r = -0.209, p = 0.049). However, regression models only showed significant results for predicting the total born from damaged acrosomes and those born alive from cPARP, although the coefficients of determination were very low. Since semen quality and fertility were good, most parameters did not affect fertility outcomes. In agreement with previous studies, acrosomal damage would be a reliable predictor of reproductive outcomes, whereas cPARP would show potential as a novel biomarker.

Indexed as

AcrosomeFertilityPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Semen AnalysisSus scrofaAnimalsBiomarkersDNA DamageFemaleInsemination, ArtificialMaleSemenSpermatozoaSwineBiomarkersPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1boar semensemen analysisseminal plasmaswine reproduction

Identifiers

PMID41222051
PMCPMC12606694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.