ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
Adding Early Postnatal Parameters of Ventilation to Prognostic Models for Pulmonary Outcome in Very Preterm Infants.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adding Early Postnatal Parameters of Ventilation to Prognostic Models for Pulmonary Outcome in Very Preterm Infants.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo compare discrimination and calibration of prognostic models for pulmonary outcomes in very preterm (VPT) infants born < 32 weeks' gestation when including the mean airway pressure (MAP), the fraction of supplemental oxygen (FiO
methodsIn this retrospective single center study of 168 VPT infants, the mean airway pressure (MAP), the fraction of supplemental oxygen (FiO
resultsThe baseline model demonstrated good calibration (slope 1.02) and discrimination (AUC 0.85) for overall BPD (BPD28), and adding any of the parameters of ventilation resulted only in slight improvement in discrimination (AUC 0.86). For moderate/severe BPD (BPD36), overprediction in the lower extremes and underprediction in the upper extremes became evident for the baseline model. While adding MAP rendered optimal specificity (81%), sensitivity (91%) was highest for FiO
conclusionAdding parameters of ventilation and oxygenation improves baseline models to predict the risk of BPD28 and BPD36 early after birth. Particularly, our data encourage considering MAP as potential predictor in the development of future risk models to improve the prediction accuracy and to solidify early treatment decisions intended to prevent BPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.