ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2025
Visceral fat assessment in rectal adenocarcinoma: the role of computed tomography, sagittal abdominal diameter, and waist circumference.
Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local fat, local risk: mesorectal fat volume outperforms BMI in predicting rectal cancer surgery outcomes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate correlations between anthropometric tools for visceral fat assessment, including waist circumference (WC) and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), by computed tomography (CT)-derived visceral fat volume in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.
methodsThis comparative cross-sectional study included 138 participants: rectal adenocarcinoma patients (group 1, n = 69) and controls (group 2, n = 69). Assessed variables were weight, body mass index (BMI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), WC, SAD, and CT-derived visceral fat volume measured with Fat Tissue (Syngo.Via VB20, Siemens). CT analysis was restricted to group 1.
resultsMedian ages in groups 1 and 2 were 60 and 53 years, respectively (p < 0.0008). CT revealed sex-based differences in visceral fat: 20.91 cm3 in females and 31.29 cm3 in males (p = 0.0043). WC and SAD demonstrated statistically significant correlations with CT-derived visceral fat in group 1 (p < 0.0001).
conclusionWC and SAD correlated with CT-derived visceral fat in rectal adenocarcinoma patients. These exploratory findings require validation by larger studies with multivariable analyses to establish predictive value and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.