Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221817›Full record

ArticlePersonality and mental health2025

Minimal Impact of Sensation-Related Items on the Association Between Alexithymia and Self-Report Measures of Interoception.

Adam Ottley-Porter, Kiera L Adams, Rebecca Brewer, Jennifer Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam Ottley-PorterDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Kiera L AdamsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rebecca BrewerRoyal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-7590
Jennifer MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/X010295/1University of Oxford Medical Sciences Graduate School
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests a relationship between alexithymia and self-report measures of interoception. As measures of alexithymia often include items that may pick up on interoceptive difficulty, however, it is possible that previously reported associations are driven by a lack of independence of measurement. Here, we explored the effect of removing sensation-related items from the Toronto Alexithymia Questionnaire (TAS-20) on the association between the TAS-20 and self-report measures of interoceptive accuracy (Studies 1 and 2; N = 330 and N = 476, respectively) and attention (Study 2). In both studies, removal of sensation-related items significantly reduced associations between the self-report measures of interoception and alexithymia. This effect was specific to the removal of sensation-related items (removing a random set of items did not result in a reduction in the size of the association). Importantly, relationships between alexithymia and self-reported interoception remained after item removal. Although effects were modest, it is recommended that future studies exploring relationships with self-report measures of interoception-particularly in relation to constructs where sensation-related items may broadly feature-should implement sensitivity analyses or employ alternative instruments that exclude sensation-related items, to ensure associations are not driven by a lack of independence of measurement.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsInteroceptionSelf ReportSensationAdolescentAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultalexithymiainteroceptioninteroceptive accuracyinteroceptive attentioninteroceptive sensibilityself‐reported interoception

Identifiers

PMID41221817
PMCPMC12606692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.