ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Surrogate Endpoints in Pivotal Clinical Trials for Drug Approval in Japan Compared to the United States.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tissue-Agnostic Targeting in Solid Tumors: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Resistance Determinants Across Histologies.Oncology research · 2026Pooled it
- Surrogate Endpoints in Pivotal Clinical Trials for Drug Approval in Japan Compared to the United States.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory guidance documents exist on surrogate endpoints in the United States. In Japan, there are no established rules or guidance regarding the use of surrogate endpoints, and various aspects remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of surrogate endpoints in Japan for drugs approved in Japan from 1999 to 2022, referring to the list established by the Food and Drug Administration. Precisely 2307 drugs were approved in Japan during the 24-year survey period. Of these, 1012 drugs (43.9%) were indicated for diseases for which surrogate endpoints were specified in the Surrogate Endpoint Table established by the Food and Drug Administration. After examining the endpoints used in clinical trials for 1012 drugs, 947 (93.6%) were approved based on the same surrogate endpoint as the Food and Drug Administration, whereas 65 (6.4%) were approved based on a different surrogate endpoint. In areas such as diabetes, there was a tendency to use surrogate endpoints established by the Food and Drug Administration, whereas for pharmaceuticals targeting pathogenic organisms, Japan's surrogate endpoints were typically used. Our findings demonstrate that several pharmaceuticals in Japan use surrogate endpoints similar to those of the Food and Drug Administration. These findings are expected to aid in the formulation of guidelines for the use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials for future drug approvals in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.