Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221782›Full record

SynthesisAnimal models and experimental medicine2025

A systematic review of transgender male rodent model methodology.

Kai Robertson, Dylan Lane, Daniel Donner, Jason Peart, Eugene du Toit

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of transgender male rodent model methodology.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kai RobertsonSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-5477-951X
Dylan LaneSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel DonnerTranslational Cardiology Centre, Baker Institute for Heart and Diabetes, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason PeartSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Eugene du ToitSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Higher degree research student funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust preclinical models of transgender male (TGM) gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) can inform clinicians of the isolated effects of GAHT; however existing models vary significantly in approach. We aimed to assess existing methodology and how it influences circulating sex-hormone levels in rodent models of TGM GAHT to provide recommendations of best practise. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies that investigated GAHT in rodent models and were published from inception to the 1st of August 2024. Study characteristics and methodology were extracted and compared. Post-intervention circulating sex hormone concentrations were the primary outcome used to determine whether successful gender affirming hormone therapy had been achieved. Sixteen experimental rodent studies were included. Studies were performed on mice (n = 11) and rats (n = 5). Subcutaneous (SC) pellets and SC silastic implants were featured in some studies but weekly SC injections of testosterone enanthate was the preferred method. Sesame oil was the preferred solvent for injected testosterone formulations. Weekly doses of ~450 μg (mice) and ~420-900 μg (rats) consistently induced the testosterone levels of the male counterpart. Similarly, 10 mg of unesterified testosterone in a SC silastic implant in mice or 10 mg/100 g in rats were also successful methods. Most studies administered hormones for 6-8 weeks before performing post-treatment assessments. This review demonstrates that methods largely varied across studies and successfully identifies the effective methodological approaches that improve the reproducibility and accuracy of preclinical models. Representing an integral step forward to bridging gaps in preclinical transgender healthcare research.

Indexed as

Gender-Affirming ProceduresTestosteroneAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMaleMiceModels, AnimalRatsTransgender PersonsTestosteroneanimal modelendocrinologyhormone therapymethodologytransgender

Identifiers

PMID41221782
PMCPMC12746192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.